In a UML profile, I have:
·
A <<metaclass>> ”Class”
·
A <<stereotype>> ”Obj” extending
”Class”
·
Three <<stereotype>>s
(”ProcessObj”,”ResourceObj”,”ReferenceObj”) specializing ”Obj”
Like this:
When I use the three <<stereotype>>s ”ProcessObj”,”ResourceObj”,”ReferenceObj”, they all have inherited the tags from ”Obj” – so far so good.
BUT: the tags are not grouped according to the tag groups –
in fact they don’t seem to have the tag groups (although the tags themselves
are all there).
If I double check by including the ”Obj” in a toolbox in the
MDG file, the ”Obj” does have the tags grouped properly.
I have many stereotypes sharing a common set of base tags.
Is this not the proper way to do it?
I’m not familiar with how to use the Metatype, but have
tried different variations without that solving this issue.
Does any body know how to do this (sharing a common set of
tags)?
Also: Am I using the ”Generalization” connector in a wrong
way in my UML profile?
